Summary
The New Jersey Supreme Court determined that interviews with children that involve coercion or suggestion can alter their memories. Therefore, a hearing must take place before the trial. During this hearing, the State is responsible for demonstrating, with clear and convincing evidence, that the child's testimony remains trustworthy despite the interview techniques used.
Summary
The New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled that children's memories can be negatively affected by interviews that are coercive or suggestive. Because of this, a hearing is now required before a trial can begin. During this hearing, the State must show strong evidence that the child's testimony is still dependable.
Summary
The New Jersey Supreme Court decided that interviews with children, if they are forceful or suggestive, can change what a child remembers. Because of this, a special hearing must happen before a trial. At this hearing, the State has to show strong evidence that the child's testimony is still trustworthy.
Summary
The New Jersey Supreme Court decided that interviews which push or suggest answers can change what children remember. Because of this, a special meeting must happen before a trial. At this meeting, the State has to show clear and strong proof that the child's statements can still be trusted.