State v. Coburn
SimpleOriginal

Summary

The Montana Supreme Court upheld a homicide sentence after considering expert testimony on FASD, ADHD, and childhood trauma. It concluded the defendant failed to show those conditions prevented him from conforming his conduct to law.

2018 | State Juristiction

State v. Coburn

Keywords homicide sentence; FASD; ADHD; childhood trauma; legal defense; expert testimony; criminal responsibility; mental conditions
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Montana Supreme Court considered expert testimony regarding Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and childhood trauma during a review of a homicide sentence. The Court determined that the defendant did not demonstrate these conditions prevented adherence to legal standards of conduct.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Montana Supreme Court supported a homicide sentence. The Court reviewed expert opinions regarding Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD), Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), and trauma experienced during childhood. Ultimately, the Court determined the defendant did not prove these conditions stopped the defendant from following the law.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Montana Supreme Court supported a murder sentence. The Court looked at what experts said about Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD), ADHD, and problems from childhood. It decided that the defendant did not prove these conditions stopped him from following the law.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

Montana's highest court decided to keep a sentence for a killing. The court heard what experts said about some conditions. These included Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD), ADHD, and bad things that happened when the person was a child. But the court said the person did not prove these problems stopped him from following the law.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

State v. Coburn, 393 Mont. 73 (2018)

Highlights