State v. Bottrell
SimpleOriginal

Summary

The court held that PTSD is generally accepted in the psychiatric community as a condition that may cause diminished capacity, and that expert testimony linking PTSD flashbacks to impaired intent was admissible to negate murder intent.

2000 | State Juristiction

State v. Bottrell

Keywords PTSD; diminished capacity; expert testimony; impaired intent; negate murder intent; psychiatric community; PTSD flashbacks; admissible; murder intent; condition
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The court determined that Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is widely recognized within the psychiatric field as a condition capable of leading to diminished mental capacity. Expert testimony connecting PTSD flashbacks to impaired intent was considered permissible for the purpose of disproving the intent to commit murder.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The court determined that Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is widely recognized within the psychiatric field as a condition capable of reducing an individual's mental capacity. Expert testimony connecting PTSD flashbacks to impaired intent was permissible to counter the intent to commit murder.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The court determined that Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) is widely recognized within the psychiatric field as a condition capable of reducing a person's mental capacity. Expert testimony connecting PTSD flashbacks to a lessened ability to form intent was deemed acceptable to counter claims of intent to commit murder.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The court decided that most doctors who study mental health agree that PTSD can make it harder for a person to think clearly. The court also said that a professional's opinion about how PTSD flashbacks could stop someone from planning to commit murder could be used as evidence.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

State v. Bottrell, 103 Wash. App. 706, 714–20, 14 P.3d 164, 169–73 (2000).

Highlights