Shahzade v. Gregory
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this case, the court allowed introduction of repressed memory evidence of alleged childhood sexual abuse under Rule 702 and Daubert standards.

1996 | Federal Juristiction

Shahzade v. Gregory

Keywords repressed memory; childhood sexual abuse; Rule 702; Daubert standards; sexual abuse; memory evidence; alleged abuse
Open Case as PDF

Summary

In this legal proceeding, the court authorized the introduction of evidence pertaining to repressed memories of alleged childhood sexual abuse, based on its assessment against the criteria of Rule 702 and Daubert standards.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The court permitted the presentation of evidence concerning alleged childhood sexual abuse derived from repressed memories. This decision was made in accordance with the standards set forth by Rule 702 and the Daubert ruling.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In this specific case, the court permitted the use of evidence concerning recovered memories of alleged childhood sexual abuse. This decision was made in accordance with the legal guidelines known as Rule 702 and Daubert standards.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The court in this case allowed evidence about memories that were forgotten for a long time. These memories were about claimed childhood abuse. The court let this be shown because it met the rules for what kind of information can be used in court.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Shahzade v. Gregory, 923 F. Supp. 286 (D. Mass. 1996)

Highlights