Summary
The Delaware Superior Court recently made a decision regarding expert testimony. The court decided not to allow an expert to testify about the exact time a plaintiff's alleged repressed memory started. The court's reasoning was that there was not enough reliable scientific evidence to accurately determine when memory repression begins.
Summary
The Delaware Superior Court recently decided to exclude specific expert testimony. This testimony aimed to identify the exact time a plaintiff's alleged repressed memory first appeared. The court determined there was not enough reliable scientific evidence to pinpoint the beginning of memory repression with accuracy.
Summary
The Delaware Superior Court did not allow an expert to testify about when a plaintiff's repressed memory might have started. The court found there was not enough reliable scientific evidence to pinpoint the exact time when a memory becomes repressed.
Summary
A court in Delaware did not allow a special helper to talk about when someone's forgotten memory might have started. The court decided there was not enough good science to know exactly when a memory is pushed out of the mind.