Jordan v. Epps
SimpleOriginal

Summary

The 5th Circuit denied habeas relief, holding that counsel’s failure to develop PTSD evidence and challenge forensic testimony did not prejudice the defendant because aggravating evidence overwhelmingly supported the death sentence.

2014 | Federal Juristiction

Jordan v. Epps

Keywords habeas relief; PTSD evidence; forensic testimony; death sentence; aggravating evidence; counsel's failure; prejudice
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the request for habeas corpus relief. The court determined that the defendant was not harmed by their legal counsel's failure to present evidence of PTSD or to contest forensic testimony. This decision was based on the finding that the compelling evidence supporting the death sentence was extensive.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the request for habeas corpus relief. The court determined that the defendant was not harmed by legal counsel's failure to present evidence of PTSD or to contest forensic testimony. This conclusion was based on the finding that the existing evidence supporting a death sentence was substantial.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The 5th Circuit Court denied a request for habeas relief. The court determined that the defendant's legal counsel did not harm the case by failing to present evidence of PTSD or by not challenging expert witness testimony. This was because the existing evidence supporting the death sentence was very strong.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A court called the 5th Circuit rejected a request to free a person from jail. The person's lawyer did not show proof about PTSD or question what an expert said. The court decided this did not hurt the person's case because there were many other things that were considered that made the death sentence fair.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Jordan v. Epps, 756 F.3d 395, 412–13 (5th Cir. 2014)

Highlights