Dep't of Children and Families v. DE
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this Florida state case, the appeals court ordered termination of the mother’s rights due to chronic substance use and not engaging in treatment. It upheld the father’s rights, finding his recovery efforts supported reunification.

2021 | State Juristiction

Dep't of Children and Families v. DE

Keywords Florida appeals court; termination of parental rights; parental rights termination; reunification; child custody; Florida child custody; recovery efforts; father's rights; substance use; substance addiction
Open Case as PDF

Case Summary

This Florida appellate court decision involved a termination of parental rights case. The court terminated the mother's parental rights based on her persistent substance use and failure to participate in treatment programs. Conversely, the father's parental rights were upheld due to evidence of his commitment to recovery and subsequent efforts toward reunification with his child.

Open Case as PDF

Florida Case: Parental Rights Termination

This Florida appellate court decision highlights a stark contrast in parental fitness. The court terminated the mother's parental rights based on her persistent substance use and failure to participate in mandated treatment programs. Conversely, the father's demonstrated commitment to recovery and active engagement in rehabilitation efforts resulted in the affirmation of his parental rights. The ruling underscores the court's prioritization of a child's best interests, weighing the parents' actions and their impact on the child's well-being.

Open Case as PDF

Florida Case: Termination of Parental Rights

A Florida appeals court ended the mother's parental rights because of her long-term substance use problem and refusal to get help. The court, however, decided to let the father keep his parental rights, because he was actively working to overcome his own issues and get back together with his child.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A Florida court took away a mom's rights because she used substances and did not want to get help. The court let the dad keep his rights because he was trying to get better.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

325 So.3d 277 (2021)

Highlights