Borawick v. Shay
SimpleOriginal

Summary

In this Second Circuit case, the court ruled that memories recalled after hypnosis are not automatically allowed, and here it found the plaintiff’s recovered abuse memories too unreliable to use in court.

1995 | Federal Juristiction

Borawick v. Shay

Keywords Second Circuit; hypnosis; recovered memories; unreliable memories; abuse memories; court ruling; plaintiff; legal case; evidence; admissibility
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Second Circuit Court determined that memories recalled following hypnosis are not automatically admissible in legal proceedings. In this particular instance, the court deemed the plaintiff's recovered memories of abuse to be insufficiently reliable for presentation in court.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The court in this Second Circuit case determined that memories recalled after hypnosis are not automatically admissible as evidence. In this specific instance, the plaintiff's recovered memories of abuse were deemed too unreliable for use in court proceedings.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

In a case heard by the Second Circuit Court, a ruling determined that memories brought back through hypnosis are not automatically permitted as evidence. The court in this specific case found the plaintiff's memories of abuse, which were recovered after hypnosis, to be too unreliable for use in legal proceedings.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

A court looked at a case where someone remembered abuse after hypnosis. The court decided that memories from after hypnosis are not always allowed in court. In this case, the court found the person's memories were not strong enough to be used.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Borawick v. Shay, 68 F.3d 597 (2d Cir. 1995)

Highlights