Apodaca v Raemish
SimpleOriginal

Summary

Certiorari was denied on prisoners’ 8th Amendment claims over denial of outdoor exercise in solitary confinement; Sotomayor warned such isolation causes severe psychological harm, citing research on its damaging mental effects.

2018 | Federal Juristiction

Apodaca v Raemish

Keywords 8th Amendment; solitary confinement; psychological harm; outdoor exercise; mental effects; isolation
Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Supreme Court declined to review a case where prisoners in solitary confinement argued that being denied outdoor exercise violated their Eighth Amendment rights. Justice Sotomayor, however, issued a statement regarding the denial of certiorari. She highlighted the severe psychological harm caused by prolonged solitary confinement, referencing studies that demonstrate its detrimental impact on mental health.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Supreme Court chose not to hear a case regarding prisoners' Eighth Amendment claims. These claims were based on the denial of outdoor exercise for individuals held in solitary confinement. Justice Sotomayor issued a warning that this type of isolation leads to significant psychological damage. She referred to research highlighting the harmful mental impacts of such conditions.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

The Supreme Court chose not to hear the claims made by prisoners regarding their Eighth Amendment rights. These claims concerned the denial of outdoor exercise for those held in solitary confinement. Justice Sotomayor expressed concerns, noting that such isolation can lead to serious psychological damage. Her warning was based on research highlighting the harmful mental impacts of this type of confinement.

Open Case as PDF

Summary

Prisoners in solitary confinement asked the Supreme Court to hear their case. They said not being allowed to exercise outside went against their Eighth Amendment rights. The Court chose not to hear their case. Justice Sotomayor warned that keeping people in isolation can cause serious harm to their minds. She pointed to studies that show how bad it can be for mental health.

Open Case as PDF

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Apodaca v. Raemisch, 139 S. Ct. 5 (2018)

Highlights