Problems with Access to Adolescent Mental Health Care Can Lead to Dealings with the Criminal Justice System
Stanley Kutcher
Ainslie McDougall
SummaryOriginal

Summary

Mental health issues are common in young people but often undiagnosed. Up to 70% of incarcerated youth have mental disorders. Early intervention and treatment are crucial to keep young people out of the justice system.

2009

Problems with Access to Adolescent Mental Health Care Can Lead to Dealings with the Criminal Justice System

Keywords Mental health; young people; early identification; early intervention; mental health care; justice system; incarcerated youth

Abstract

Mental disorders collectively constitute the largest burden of disease in young people. They have substantial negative short- and long-term outcomes across many domains, yet early identification and effective intervention can improve outcomes and can often lead to recovery. Unfortunately, many young people do not receive the mental health care they require and may consequently enter the justice system. Studies of incarcerated youths show that up to 70% of them have mental disorders. Many of these youth receive primarily custodial care. A variety of social, legal and medical interventions can and should be implemented to ensure that young people suffering from mental disorders do not inappropriately enter the justice system due to lack of access to health care and other services.

Adolescence is an important developmental period characterized by substantial physical, emotional, behavioural, educational/vocational and social transitions. Fifteen per cent to 20% of young people experience substantial mental health problems, usually as a result of mental disorders (2,3) or risk-taking behaviours (4–6). Mental disorders are highly prevalent in young people, comprising approximately one-third of the global burden of disease in this age group (7); approximately 75% onset before 24 years of age (8,9). In adolescence, they may be the continuation of disorders first occuring in childhood or may be the first onset of what frequently continues as a life-long difficulty with substantial morbidity, significant socioeconomic consequences and increased early mortality (7,10–13).

While well-established, effective treatments exist (14–16), recent studies (3,17–20) estimate that only 25% to 30% of young people who need mental health treatment receive it. Two of every three depressed children do not receive an appropriate diagnosis by a primary care physician (21,22), and even when a diagnosis is given, only 50% receive appropriate treatment (23). While recent attempts have been made to develop standardized treatment guidelines for adolescent mental disorders (ie, guidelines for adolescent depression in primary care [24]), a substantial gap remains between treatment need and treatment availability (17).

Access to Services and Basic Human Rights

This substantial gap between need and treatment availability exists in spite of well-established evidence of treatment efficacy and in contravention of a young person's right to health care. For example, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child states that “the child who is physically, mentally or socially handicapped shall be given the special treatment, education and care required by his particular condition” (25). The United Nations Principle for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care (26) defines mental health care as “analysis and diagnosis of a person's mental condition, and treatment, care and rehabilitation for the mental illness or suspected mental illness”. Furthermore, the Declaration on the Rights of the Child (25) document states that “no child shall be subjected to torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment” and that the rights of children with ‘special needs’ will be ‘safeguarded’. The Principle for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care (26) states that “all persons with a mental illness, or who are being treated as such persons, shall be treated with humanity and respect for the inherent dignity of the human person” and “access to a mental health facility shall be administered in the same way as access to any other facility for any other illness”. Thus, the appropriate address of mental health care needs of young people is not only a well-established clinical necessity, but is also mandated by significant ethical and moral principles as part of the right to health.

Over-Representation of Mental Illness in the Criminal Justice System

These issues notwithstanding, mental health care that meets the needs of Canadian young people is not readily available (20,17). Problems include long waiting lists for specialty mental health services, lack of mental health care in primary care, inadequate numbers of health providers with necessary mental health competencies, poor coordination among institutions and organizations serving young people and government agencies tasked with ensuring service provision, and lack of specific child and youth mental health policies at both provincial and federal levels (2,17–30). Recently, concerns have been raised about the increasing numbers of young people suffering from mental health problems who seem to be directed into the juvenile justice system because of a lack of accessible and appropriate mental health care (18,31–33). According to the Criminal Justice/Mental Health Consensus Project (34), detention facilities have become the largest providers of mental health services for young people, and are often considered the last resort for mentally ill youth and their families.

Twenty-five per cent of those hospitalized for a mental illness have a history of criminal behaviour (32). The best available estimates note that up to 70% of incarcerated adolescents may suffer from a mental disorder (including alcohol or drug abuse), with a significant proportion experiencing functional impairment as a result (35–37) (Table 1). Furthermore, while most offenses committed by persons suffering from a mental disorder are nonviolent, the presence of a mental disorder at the time of apprehension for suspicion of a criminal act increases the likelihood of a negative outcome in terms of subsequent contact with the justice system. This includes higher rates of arrests at the scene of the offense (38), longer detention periods and higher rates of recidivism (39).

The reasons for the high rates for mental health care needs among incarcerated youth are multifactoral and complex (31,32,40,41). Compared with the general adolescent population, the prevalence of mental disorders in the criminal justice system is now two to four times greater (32,42) (Table 1). The presence of such large numbers of youths with significant needs for mental health care has put substantial strain on the justice system, which has not been designed nor created to deal with them (43,44). Only one-third of incarcerated males and one-fourth of incarcerated females needing mental health services receive them (45,46), raising concerns that custodial interventions are replacing the need for therapeutic mental health care (47). Effectively addressing the mental health needs of young people before their becoming involved in the juvenile justice system may result in fewer incarcerations and improved short-and long-term personal, social and economic outcomes.

A variety of mental health problems are known to increase the risk for entry into the juvenile justice system. These include individual factors (such as the presence of mental disorders), familial risk factors (ie, family history of incarceration or mental disorder, and problematic parenting) and community risk factors (ie, resident in high crime and high drug use neighborhoods). Addressing the mental health-related aspects of each of these risk factors may be an appropriate approach toward effectively dealing with this issue (48). In all risk domains, it is essential that interventions be demonstrated to be effective using well-established program effectiveness criteria (49). Unfortunately, many of the interventions currently used either have not been properly evaluated or are known to not demonstrate positive robust outcomes (48–50). It is essential that when prevention or intervention programs are put into place, they meet fundamental criteria of scientific integrity and program accountability (51).

Negative Effects of Incarceration on Mental Health

It is well-appreciated that the prison environment may lead to or exacerbate mental health problems such as victimization by other inmates or by prison staff, and access to illicit substances. Additionally, separation from social supports may cause further stresses that in the presence of toxic environmental pressures may increase the risk or exacerbation of mental problems in vulnerable youth (34,52). These and other factors may interact to increase the risk for suicide, which is elevated in this population and is indicative of poor mental health (6,53,54). Furthermore, the common misperception that persons living with mental illnesses are violent (the reality is that they are more commonly victims of violence) is perpetuated by incarceration of young people suffering from mental disorders (55).

Potential Solutions

Unique programs exist that attempt to divert persons with mental disorders from the criminal justice system to community-based mental health treatments and other social supports. Preliminary results demonstrate a number of positive outcomes including reduced risk for recidivism, less jail time, more involvement with mental health professionals and increased use of community-based services (32,56). Their utility, however, is dependent on the availability of highly trained staff, a judiciary that is familiar with and supportive of this approach, and effective collaboration with health, mental health and community service providers. However, not all such programs may be equally useful. For example, programs that require the admission of guilt before treatment is provided can perpetuate stigma associated with both mental illness and incarceration (43,56).

Another potential solution involves screening for mental health disorders and addictions at intake into the criminal justice institution to identify issues that need to be addressed during the rehabilitative process (6) (Table 2). However, access to appropriate and timely services within the justice facility, while integral to rehabilitation, may not be available.

Other potential solutions include mental health literacy and sensitivity training for judges, first responders and juvenile justice workers. Although this will require substantial redesign of the current approach to mental health care delivery (57), it must be addressed. From a policy perspective, it is hoped that the recently constituted Mental Health Commission of Canada may be able to play a role in the innovative modelling that is necessary to move this solution forward.

Additionally, we require substantial investment in research addressing optimal approaches to preventing mental disorders in young people and in programs that can most cost-effectively lead to optimal outcomes for youth who are involved in problematic behaviours. Unfortunately, the paucity of high-quality scientific evidence for the effectiveness of many commonly used interventions does not engender confidence in programs currently offered (2,27,44,50). New programs must be rigorously and scientifically evaluated to determine their outcome effectiveness. This necessity also applies to the development and application of mental health and related interventions provided for young people currently involved in the criminal justice system (35,44,58). A recent federal report (20) on the need to address the mental health problems of Canadian young people may spur collateral interest in this previously neglected subgroup.

Currently, it is not clear whether the national political climate is favourable to implementation of these possible solutions. In addition to the many ‘priorities’ constantly being juggled by policy makers and providers alike, there may be more ideologically driven perspectives that focus on traditional ‘law and order’ rather than mental health therapeutic approaches to this issue (59).

Conclusion

It is well known that mental disorders are the most commonly disabling medical conditions in young people, and that there is both a clinical and ethical imperative to address them in the most appropriate, evidence-based and cost-effective manner. It is also well appreciated that the availability of high-quality mental health care for young people falls short of need, and there are serious concerns that this is leading to displacement of youth into a criminal justice system that is both poorly equipped and an inappropriate forum to deal with their mental health needs.

A variety of solutions exist, but more need to be developed. Currently, good evidence is available to support the application of a variety of intervention and prevention programs – these should be implemented. Additionally, good evidence exists that some programs currently in place are neither effective nor cost-effective – these should be discontinued. Further research into the development and delivery of new evidence-based interventions is necessary and innovative approaches to the delivery of mental health care rather than traditional mental health services need to be explored.

Link to Article

Abstract

Mental disorders collectively constitute the largest burden of disease in young people. They have substantial negative short- and long-term outcomes across many domains, yet early identification and effective intervention can improve outcomes and can often lead to recovery. Unfortunately, many young people do not receive the mental health care they require and may consequently enter the justice system. Studies of incarcerated youths show that up to 70% of them have mental disorders. Many of these youth receive primarily custodial care. A variety of social, legal and medical interventions can and should be implemented to ensure that young people suffering from mental disorders do not inappropriately enter the justice system due to lack of access to health care and other services.

Introduction

Adolescence is a period marked by significant developmental transitions, with 15-20% of young people experiencing mental health challenges, often due to mental disorders or risky behaviors [1-6]. Mental disorders constitute a substantial global health burden in this age group, with approximately 75% of cases emerging before the age of 24 [7-9]. Adolescent mental health issues may represent the continuation of childhood disorders or the initial manifestation of enduring conditions with significant morbidity, socioeconomic impact, and elevated mortality risk [7, 10-13]. Despite the existence of efficacious treatments [14-16], studies indicate that only 25-30% of young people requiring mental health services actually receive them [3, 17-20]. This treatment gap is particularly evident in primary care settings, where underdiagnosis and inadequate treatment of depression are prevalent [21-23]. Although efforts have been made to establish standardized treatment protocols for adolescent mental disorders [24], a substantial disparity persists between the need for and provision of mental health services [17].

Access to Services and Fundamental Human Rights

The gap between mental health service needs and provision is unacceptable given the robust evidence supporting treatment efficacy and the violation of young people's fundamental right to healthcare. The United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child explicitly mandates specialized treatment, education, and care for children with physical, mental, or social disabilities [25]. Furthermore, the UN Principle for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness and for the Improvement of Mental Health Care delineates comprehensive mental health care, encompassing diagnosis, treatment, care, and rehabilitation [26]. These documents underscore the ethical and moral imperatives to protect the rights and dignity of individuals with mental illnesses, ensuring their humane treatment and equitable access to healthcare. Therefore, addressing the mental health needs of young people is not merely a clinical necessity but a fundamental human right.

Disproportionate Representation of Mental Illness in the Criminal Justice System

Despite these ethical and legal obligations, access to appropriate mental health services for Canadian youth remains inadequate [17, 20]. Barriers include prolonged waitlists for specialized services, insufficient mental health care integration in primary care, a shortage of qualified mental health professionals, inadequate coordination among service organizations and government agencies, and the absence of comprehensive child and youth mental health policies at both provincial and federal levels [2, 17-30]. Consequently, there is growing concern about the increasing number of young individuals with mental health issues entering the juvenile justice system due to the lack of accessible and timely mental health care [18, 31-33]. Disturbingly, detention facilities have become the de facto providers of mental health services for many young people, often representing a last resort for families struggling to access appropriate care [34].

The overrepresentation of mental illness within the criminal justice system is stark. Studies estimate that up to 70% of incarcerated adolescents may have a mental disorder, often with significant functional impairment [35-37] (Table 1). While most offenses committed by individuals with mental illness are nonviolent, the presence of a mental disorder during apprehension increases the likelihood of negative outcomes within the justice system, including higher arrest rates, longer detentions, and increased recidivism [38, 39]. This overrepresentation places a significant strain on the justice system, which is ill-equipped to adequately address the complex needs of this population [43, 44]. Alarmingly, only a fraction of incarcerated youth receive the mental health services they require [45, 46], raising concerns about the criminalization of mental illness and the substitution of therapeutic interventions with custodial measures [47].

Detrimental Impact of Incarceration on Mental Health

The prison environment itself can exacerbate existing mental health problems or trigger new ones. Factors such as inmate and staff victimization, exposure to illicit substances, and separation from social support networks can have a detrimental impact on vulnerable youth, increasing the risk or severity of mental health issues [34, 52]. Consequently, suicide rates are elevated in this population, underscoring the urgent need for improved mental health care [6, 53, 54]. Furthermore, incarcerating young individuals with mental disorders perpetuates the harmful stereotype that they are inherently violent, despite being more likely to be victims of violence themselves [55].

Potential Solutions

Several promising programs aim to divert individuals with mental disorders from the criminal justice system and connect them with community-based mental health services and social supports. Preliminary findings indicate positive outcomes, including reduced recidivism rates, shorter incarceration periods, increased engagement with mental health professionals, and greater utilization of community-based resources [32, 56]. However, the effectiveness of such programs hinges on the availability of trained personnel, judicial understanding and support, and robust collaboration among health, mental health, and community service providers. Crucially, programs should not perpetuate stigma by requiring admission of guilt as a prerequisite for treatment [43, 56].

Other potential solutions include:

  • Universal Mental Health Screening: Implementing routine mental health and addiction screening upon entry into the justice system to facilitate timely identification and intervention [6] (Table 2).

  • Training for Justice System Personnel: Providing mental health literacy and sensitivity training to judges, first responders, and juvenile justice workers to improve their understanding and response to individuals with mental illness [57].

  • Investment in Research and Evidence-Based Programs: Dedicating resources to research that investigates effective prevention and intervention strategies for youth mental health, particularly within the justice system [2, 27, 44, 50]. Rigorous evaluation is crucial to ensure that programs meet scientific standards and demonstrate positive outcomes [49, 51].

Conclusion

Mental disorders represent a significant public health concern, impacting young people at alarming rates. Access to timely and appropriate mental health care is not merely a clinical imperative but a fundamental human right. The current overrepresentation of mental illness within the criminal justice system underscores the urgent need for systemic change. By investing in prevention, early intervention, community-based services, and evidence-based programs, we can better address the mental health needs of young people and create a more just and equitable society. However, translating these solutions into tangible policy and practice will require a sustained commitment from policymakers, service providers, and the public at large.

Link to Article

Abstract

Mental disorders collectively constitute the largest burden of disease in young people. They have substantial negative short- and long-term outcomes across many domains, yet early identification and effective intervention can improve outcomes and can often lead to recovery. Unfortunately, many young people do not receive the mental health care they require and may consequently enter the justice system. Studies of incarcerated youths show that up to 70% of them have mental disorders. Many of these youth receive primarily custodial care. A variety of social, legal and medical interventions can and should be implemented to ensure that young people suffering from mental disorders do not inappropriately enter the justice system due to lack of access to health care and other services.

Adolescence is a crucial period marked by significant changes – physically, emotionally, behaviorally, and socially. During this time, about 15% to 20% of young people face mental health challenges, often stemming from mental disorders or risky behaviors. Mental disorders are alarmingly common in this age group, making up a third of the global disease burden. A significant 75% of these disorders emerge before the age of 24. These disorders can either begin in childhood and continue, or first appear in adolescence, often becoming lifelong struggles. This leads to a lower quality of life, major social and economic consequences, and even a higher risk of early death.

We have effective treatments, yet studies show that only 25% to 30% of young people who need mental health help actually receive it. Many young people with depression aren't properly diagnosed by their doctors. And even with a diagnosis, only half get the treatment they need. While efforts are being made to create standardized treatment guidelines (like for adolescent depression in primary care), there's still a huge gap between the need for treatment and its availability.

Mental Health Care is a Right, Not a Privilege

The lack of adequate mental health services for young people is unacceptable, especially when there's clear evidence that treatments work. This gap also violates their fundamental right to healthcare. The UN Declaration on the Rights of the Child emphasizes that children with disabilities, including mental health issues, have a right to special care and support. This right is further reinforced by the UN's Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness, which defines mental healthcare as diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation for mental health conditions. These documents emphasize that every individual, regardless of their mental health status, deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. Access to mental healthcare should be as fundamental as access to treatment for any other health condition.

The Over-Representation of Mental Illness in the Justice System

Despite these clear ethical and legal obligations, Canada still struggles to meet the mental health needs of its young population. Long waitlists for specialized care, insufficient mental health support in primary care, a shortage of trained professionals, poor coordination between agencies serving youth, and a lack of specific mental health policies at both provincial and federal levels all contribute to this problem. This lack of access to mental healthcare is pushing a growing number of young people with mental health issues into the criminal justice system – a system ill-equipped to address their needs. Detention centers, ill-suited for this purpose, are becoming the default mental health service providers for a significant number of young people.

It's estimated that 25% of those hospitalized for mental illness have a history of criminal behavior. Furthermore, studies indicate that a staggering 70% of incarcerated adolescents might be grappling with a mental disorder, often leading to significant impairment in their daily lives. While most offenses committed by individuals with mental illness are non-violent, having a mental illness at the time of arrest often results in harsher consequences within the justice system. This includes increased likelihood of arrest at the scene, longer detention periods, and a higher chance of ending up back in the system.

The reasons behind the high prevalence of mental illness within the juvenile justice system are complex. Factors like family history of mental health issues or incarceration, exposure to problematic parenting, and living in areas with high crime and drug use all play a role. Unfortunately, the justice system, not designed for therapeutic intervention, is burdened by the sheer volume of young people requiring mental health support. Only a fraction of incarcerated youth who need these services actually receive them, raising concerns that custody is replacing actual care. Addressing the mental health needs of young people before they enter the justice system could result in fewer incarcerations and ultimately, better outcomes for these individuals.

There's a clear link between various mental health problems and an increased likelihood of entering the juvenile justice system. Individual factors, such as the presence of a mental disorder, are compounded by familial risk factors, such as a family history of incarceration or mental health issues. Additionally, community risk factors, like residing in areas with high crime rates, further exacerbate the problem. Addressing these mental health aspects within each risk factor could significantly mitigate this issue. However, many current interventions lack proper evaluation or have not demonstrably yielded positive results. It's crucial that any program implemented adheres to rigorous scientific standards and is held accountable for its effectiveness.

The Detrimental Impact of Incarceration on Mental Health

Sadly, the prison environment itself can worsen existing mental health issues or even trigger new ones. The risk of victimization, both from fellow inmates and staff, along with the potential exposure to illicit substances creates a toxic environment. The forced separation from support systems adds another layer of stress, increasing the vulnerability of these young people. All these factors contribute to a higher risk of suicide among incarcerated youth, a grim indicator of their mental state. Furthermore, the misconception that individuals with mental illness are inherently violent, which is statistically inaccurate as they are more likely to be victims of violence themselves, is fueled by their overrepresentation in the justice system.

Potential Solutions: A Path Forward

There are unique programs that aim to redirect individuals with mental disorders away from the criminal justice system and toward community-based mental health services and support. Early results from these programs show promise, including reduced recidivism rates, shorter jail time, increased engagement with mental health professionals, and higher utilization of community-based resources. However, the success of these programs hinges on the availability of skilled staff, a supportive judicial system, and strong collaboration between healthcare providers and community services. It's important to note that not all diversion programs are created equal; some require admission of guilt before treatment is offered, which can further stigmatize both mental illness and incarceration.

Another potential solution involves screening for mental health and addiction issues when someone enters the criminal justice system. This can help identify needs that require attention during the rehabilitation process. However, even with identification, access to timely and appropriate services within these facilities, while crucial, is not guaranteed.

Other solutions include providing mental health literacy and sensitivity training to judges, first responders, and those working within the juvenile justice system. This approach, though requiring a significant overhaul of the current system, is essential. There's hope that the recently established Mental Health Commission of Canada can drive the innovation needed to make this a reality.

We need significant investment in research to determine the best ways to prevent mental health issues in young people and to develop cost-effective programs that yield positive results. Unfortunately, many existing interventions lack robust scientific evidence to support their effectiveness, leading to a lack of confidence in their ability to create meaningful change. New programs must undergo rigorous scientific evaluation to assess their impact, and this applies to interventions offered within the juvenile justice system as well. A recent federal report highlighting the urgent need to address mental health among Canadian youth may hopefully bring much-needed attention and resources to this often overlooked group.

Currently, it's unclear if the political climate in Canada is ready to embrace these potential solutions. The constant prioritization of other issues and a traditional emphasis on "law and order" over a therapeutic approach to mental health present significant challenges.

Conclusion

There is undeniable evidence that mental disorders are the leading cause of disability among young people. We have a moral and ethical obligation to address these issues effectively, ethically, and affordably. The current mental healthcare system fails to meet the needs of our youth, and this failure has resulted in the displacement of vulnerable young people into a justice system ill-equipped to provide the care they need.

While solutions exist, we need to develop more. We need to prioritize the implementation of evidence-based intervention and prevention programs while discontinuing those that are ineffective and wasteful. Ongoing research is crucial to developing and delivering new, evidence-based interventions. Furthermore, we must explore innovative ways to deliver mental healthcare that go beyond traditional models.

Link to Article

Abstract

Mental disorders collectively constitute the largest burden of disease in young people. They have substantial negative short- and long-term outcomes across many domains, yet early identification and effective intervention can improve outcomes and can often lead to recovery. Unfortunately, many young people do not receive the mental health care they require and may consequently enter the justice system. Studies of incarcerated youths show that up to 70% of them have mental disorders. Many of these youth receive primarily custodial care. A variety of social, legal and medical interventions can and should be implemented to ensure that young people suffering from mental disorders do not inappropriately enter the justice system due to lack of access to health care and other services.

Being a teenager is a time of big changes in one's life – physically, emotionally, and socially. It's also a time when mental health problems can show up. Sadly, lots of teens who need help with their mental health aren't getting it. This is a problem because everyone, especially young people, deserves access to healthcare, including mental healthcare. Important documents like the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of the Child make it clear that young people have the right to special care and support if they have mental health difficulties. Unfortunately, in Canada, we are not doing a good enough job at providing this care.

Over-Representation of Mental Illness in the Criminal Justice System

Many teens in Canada face long wait times for mental health services, and often the help they need isn't available in their communities. This has led to a worrying trend: more and more young people with mental health problems end up in the justice system instead of getting the help they need. Imagine the justice system like a system designed to deal with people breaking the law. It's not designed to handle mental health issues, but that's what's happening more and more. Studies show that a lot of young people in detention centers actually have mental health disorders.

Why are so many young people with mental health issues ending up in the justice system? There are many reasons, including family history of mental illness or legal trouble, living in tough neighborhoods, and, most importantly, not receiving the mental health support they need.

Negative Effects of Incarceration on Mental Illness

Being in jail or detention can be really tough on anyone, especially young people. It's stressful, sometimes dangerous, and can make existing mental health problems worse. Think about it: being away from your family and friends, in a new and scary environment, can be really hard to handle, especially if you're already struggling. This can lead to even more problems, like self-harm or suicidal thoughts.

Potential Solutions

So, what can we do? There are some programs that aim to steer young people with mental health difficulties away from the justice system and toward helpful resources in their communities. These programs seem promising, but they need trained staff, understanding judges, and good teamwork between different organizations.

Other ideas include:

  • Screening for mental health issues: When someone enters the justice system, we should check for any mental health concerns they might have. This way, they can get the right help while they are in the system.

  • Training for key people: Judges, police officers, and people working in the justice system should receive training about mental health. This will help them understand and support young people with these challenges.

  • More research and better programs: We need more research to find the best ways to prevent mental health problems in the first place and to support those who need help. We also need to make sure that the programs we have are actually working.

Right now, it's not clear if our government is ready to put these solutions into action. It requires money, effort, and a willingness to see young people with mental health challenges as needing help, not punishment.

Conclusion

It's important to remember that mental health problems are common in young people, and they deserve understanding and support. When we don't provide the right help, some young people end up in the justice system, which can make their problems worse. We need to work together to find better solutions, like providing more mental health services, educating important people about mental health, and making sure that programs are effective.

Link to Article

Abstract

Mental disorders collectively constitute the largest burden of disease in young people. They have substantial negative short- and long-term outcomes across many domains, yet early identification and effective intervention can improve outcomes and can often lead to recovery. Unfortunately, many young people do not receive the mental health care they require and may consequently enter the justice system. Studies of incarcerated youths show that up to 70% of them have mental disorders. Many of these youth receive primarily custodial care. A variety of social, legal and medical interventions can and should be implemented to ensure that young people suffering from mental disorders do not inappropriately enter the justice system due to lack of access to health care and other services.

Many kids go through lots of changes as they grow up, like physical changes, emotional changes, and changes in how they act and learn (1). Sometimes, these changes can be tough, and about 15% to 20% of kids experience mental health challenges because of these difficulties or because they take risks that can be harmful (2,3,4,5,6). Mental health problems are common in young people and can have a big impact on their lives (7). In fact, about 75% of mental health problems start before someone turns 24 (8,9). These problems can start during childhood and continue into the teenage years, or they can appear for the first time during adolescence. If these problems aren't addressed, they can last a lifetime, making it hard to live a healthy and happy life (7,10,11,12,13).

Even though we have effective ways to help kids with these problems (14,15,16), many kids don't get the help they need. Studies show that only 25% to 30% of young people who need help receive it (3,17,18,19,20). For example, many kids with depression don't get diagnosed properly by their doctor (21,22), and even when they do, only half receive the right treatment (23). While people are trying to create guidelines to help identify and treat mental health problems in teens (like guidelines for depression in kids) (24), there's still a big gap between the number of kids who need help and the help available (17).

Getting Help is a Right, Not a Privilege!

It's wrong that so many kids don't get the help they need for mental health problems, especially when we know how to help them. Everyone has the right to good health care, including mental health care. For example, The United Nations, a group of countries that work together to make the world a better place, believes all children deserve special care and support if they have physical, mental, or social challenges (25). They believe mental health care is important and includes figuring out what's wrong and providing treatment and support (26). The United Nations also believes that all children should be treated with kindness and respect, no matter what challenges they face. They also state that children with mental health problems should be able to get help just as easily as they can get help for other illnesses. So, helping kids with mental health problems is not only the right thing to do but it is also their right.

Too Many Kids With Mental Health Problems End Up In Trouble With the Law

Sadly, many young people in Canada can't get the mental health care they need. Sometimes it takes a long time to get an appointment with a mental health specialist, or there aren't enough mental health experts available to help. It can also be difficult for different organizations that are supposed to help kids, like schools and government agencies, to work together effectively. All of this means that some kids who need help end up in trouble with the law. This is a big problem because jails are not the right place for kids with mental health issues. They need help and support, not punishment. In fact, many people believe that jails have become the biggest providers of mental health services for young people, which is a sad situation.

About 25% of people in hospitals for mental illness have a history of getting into trouble with the law. Studies show that up to 70% of kids in jail may have a mental health problem, including problems with drugs or alcohol ) (Table 1). And while most kids with mental health problems don't do anything violent, they are more likely to have serious consequences if they break the law, like being arrested or spending more time in jail .

There are lots of reasons why so many kids in trouble with the law also have mental health problems. Kids in the justice system are two to four times more likely to have mental health problems compared to kids who are not (Table 1). This puts a lot of strain on the system, which wasn't designed to help kids with these problems. Sadly, very few kids in the justice system receive the mental health care they need. This means that instead of getting help, they are getting punished, which doesn't help them get better. We need to help kids before they get into trouble with the law. This will prevent them from going to jail and help them live healthier, happier lives.

There are many reasons why some kids are more likely to end up in trouble with the law. Some kids might have mental health problems, while others might have family members who have been to jail or have mental health issues. Some kids might live in neighborhoods where there is a lot of crime and drug use. It's important to help kids with all of these challenges . We need to make sure that the programs we create to help kids actually work. Sadly, many of the programs being used haven't been proven to be effective. We need to use programs that have been tested and shown to work .

Going to Jail Can Make Mental Health Problems Worse

Being in jail can be very stressful, especially for young people. They might be away from their families and friends, and they might be bullied or hurt by other people in jail. They may also have easy access to drugs, which can be harmful. All of these things can make mental health problems worse. Sadly, the stress of being in jail can lead some young people to take their own lives, which is a serious problem. People sometimes think that people with mental health problems are dangerous, but this isn't true. They are more likely to be the victims of violence than the perpetrators. Putting young people with mental health problems in jail only reinforces this harmful stereotype.

What Can We Do to Help?

There are special programs that try to help people with mental health problems stay out of jail by providing them with support and treatment in the community. Some of these programs seem to be helping – people in these programs may be less likely to get in trouble with the law again, spend less time in jail, and use mental health services more often. But these programs need well-trained staff, supportive judges, and good collaboration between different organizations to be successful. It's also important to make sure that these programs don't make people feel ashamed of having a mental illness or getting in trouble with the law.

Another solution is to check for mental health problems and addiction when someone first enters the justice system (Table 2). This can help us identify and address any problems early on. It's important to remember that even though access to mental health services within the justice system is important, it's not always available.

We can also teach judges, police officers, and other people who work in the justice system about mental health problems. This will help them understand and better respond to the needs of young people with mental health problems. We also need to invest in more research to find the best ways to prevent mental health problems in the first place, and to develop effective programs for young people who are already engaging in risky behavior. Unfortunately, we don't have a lot of evidence to support many of the programs that are currently being used . We need to make sure that new programs are carefully tested to make sure they work . Hopefully, the recent focus on mental health in Canada will lead to more support for this important issue .

It's unclear whether the government is willing to support these solutions. They have many important issues to address, and some people believe that we should focus on punishment rather than treatment for young people who break the law

Conclusion: We Can Do Better!

Mental health problems are the leading cause of disability in young people. We have a responsibility to help these young people and to make sure they have access to the best possible care. Unfortunately, many young people don't get the help they need, and some end up in the justice system, which is not equipped to deal with their needs.

We have some solutions, but we need to do more. We need to use programs that work and stop using programs that don't work. We also need to find new and innovative ways to deliver mental health care to young people. It's time to start treating mental health problems as seriously as we treat physical health problems.

Link to Article

Footnotes and Citation

Cite

Kutcher, S., & McDougall, A. (2009). Problems with access to adolescent mental health care can lead to dealings with the criminal justice system. Paediatrics & Child Health, 14(1), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/14.1.15

    Highlights